Giac Soliman and Haris Ikram unpack the gap between AI hype and practical adoption in rewards, sharing real-world use cases, responsible AI frameworks, and the emerging skills compensation teams need heading into 2026.

AI isn’t replacing compensation teams—but it is redefining what they can do.
That was the core message of our October 18 webinar, where Haris Ikram sat down with global compensation leader and CompTech Roundup creator Giac Soliman for a fast-moving, deeply practical conversation on how AI is reshaping rewards work today.
With ChatGPT and Claude both down that morning, the theme became even more real:
“Today we’re relying on Giac-GPT,” Haris joked—a reminder of just how quickly AI has become infrastructure for comp and HR teams.
Below is a full recap of the insights, frameworks, and real-world examples shared during the session.
Despite the headlines, most Total Rewards teams are still in the early stages of AI adoption. Giac explained why.
We’re all being flooded with AI news and product releases—sometimes daily.
“It’s just an extra task now to keep up with the world and upskill,” Giac noted.
For reward teams already buried in cycles, benchmarking, job architecture, and stakeholder alignment, adding “learn AI” to the pile can feel impossible.
Comp involves high-stakes, high-risk data—salary history, equity, location, performance, and market data layered together.
That means:
As Giac put it:
“We’re affecting people’s livelihoods… the more stakeholders involved, the longer it will take.”
Haris shared that leadership expectations often swing between two extremes:
Neither is true.
AI doesn’t magically eliminate work. But it can transform it—if you have good data, clear workflows, and human judgment guiding it.
Giac was direct on this point:
“The biggest risk right now isn’t AI in rewards—it’s decentralized, bottom-up AI use.”
Analysts pasting comp data into random tools. Unvetted prompts. No guardrails. No audit trails.
This is where real exposure comes from—not from well-governed tools.
Both speakers agreed: waiting carries more risk than experimenting.
Teams that delay adoption fall behind in:
As Haris put it:
“AI is the great equalizer—even 200-person orgs can now get decision-quality analytics.”
Giac shared a practical, repeatable structure for assessing and rolling out AI—one rooted in responsible, human-centered decision-making.
Before touching pay data, ask:
“One thing I always remind myself: AI should help me decide. It shouldn’t make the decision.” —Giac
Compensation leaders—not just Legal and Security—must be part of the risk review.
Key considerations:
If you can’t explain an AI-generated pay recommendation in plain language, you can’t defend it.
A good explanation sounds like:
“Based on this role, performance, and market data, the model suggests X because Y.”
AI accelerates analysis—but humans still validate context, fairness, and alignment to pay philosophy.
Key checkpoints:
“AI is an assistant, not an authority,” Giac emphasized.
Here Haris added a key point:
AI deployment is not a waterfall project—it’s iterative.
This mirrors the CandorIQ rollout philosophy: crawl → walk → run.
The webinar highlighted multiple real-world use cases—many already in place at organizations today.
Automating:
This removes hundreds of repetitive back-and-forth interactions.
AI analyzes:
…and gives comp teams a first-pass recommendation.
One of the clearest value-adds Giac cited:
“The model can fetch the tea for me—I still decide what to do with it.”
AI accelerates the math; humans drive decisions.
Teams are already using AI to:
This is high volume, low drama work—perfect for AI.
Haris highlighted CandorIQ’s work here:
All without needing a dedicated data science team.
When Haris asked Giac about the future, his answer was clear:
Historically, comp bottlenecks were:
With AI handling more of this, the constraint shifts to human judgment.
“The sweet spot isn’t who writes the fanciest prompt—it’s who exercises good judgment with AI.” —Giac
Forecasts like:
…will become standard.
AI will connect decisions across:
The walls between “reward decisions” and “business decisions” will continue to thin.
Smaller teams will suddenly have access to insights once reserved for enterprise orgs with data science departments.
We closed the session by asking both speakers for one mindset shift to bring back to your team tomorrow.
Start experimenting—with guardrails.
Don’t switch off your judgment.
“AI is everywhere. The risk isn’t AI—it’s brain rot.”
Practical AI for Total Reward L…
Leaders who use AI without judgment will be replaced by those who use both well.
AI won’t replace you.
But people who use AI will replace people who don’t.
Practical AI for Total Reward L…
And the teams who learn faster—who build small wins, iterate, and use AI as an analyst—will be the ones who gain the most strategic ground.
If you missed the live session, the full recording is available now.
You can also: